A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; Waterfall_Cache has a deprecated constructor

Filename: _common/waterfall_cache.php

Line Number: 47

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; Cache_System has a deprecated constructor

Filename: _common/waterfall_cache.php

Line Number: 194

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; Memcache_Cache_System has a deprecated constructor

Filename: _common/waterfall_cache.php

Line Number: 275

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; Filesystem_Cache_System has a deprecated constructor

Filename: _common/waterfall_cache.php

Line Number: 440

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; APC_Cache_System has a deprecated constructor

Filename: _common/waterfall_cache.php

Line Number: 628

Improving mod_perl Driven Site's Performance -- Part VI: Forking and Executing Subprocesses from mod_perl Page 8

Improving mod_perl Driven Site's Performance -- Part VI: Forking and Executing Subprocesses from mod_perl Page 8

By Stas Bekman (Send Email)
Posted Feb 27, 2001


Perl's system() is not the system(3) call [C-library]. This is how the arguments to system() get interpreted. When there is a single argument to system(), it'll be checked for for having shell metacharacters first (like *,?), and if there are any--Perl interpreter invokes a real shell program (/bin/sh -c on Unix platforms). If you pass a list of arguments to system(), they will be not checked for metacharacters, but split into words if required and passed directly to the C-level execvp() system call, which is more efficient. That's a very nice optimization. In other words, only if you do:


  system "sh -c 'echo *'"

will the operating system actually exec() a copy of /bin/sh to parse your command. But even then since sh is almost certainly already running somewhere, the system will notice that (via the disk inode reference) and replace your virtual memory page table with one pointing to the existing program code plus your data space, thus will not create this overhead.

References



Comment and Contribute

Your name/nickname

Your email

(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.


 

 


Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date