SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

Differentiating Among BSD Distros Page 4

Written By
thumbnail Martin Brown
Martin Brown
Jul 20, 2010
ServerWatch content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More



Choosing a Desktop Solution

Which flavor of BSD you chose should depend largely on what hardware the desktop uses. On an Intel- or AMD-based PC, FreeBSD is a stable and widely supported choice. For older hardware, or hardware that is not exactly mainstream, NetBSD might be a better solution. NetBSD is even more suitable for developing and deploying an application on one of the many embedded solutions, as you can probably use NetBSD on both platforms.

If you need a Unix environment but also want access to commercial applications like Microsoft Office, or products from Adobe, Alias, and others, Mac OS X delivers the best of both worlds. The FreeBSD-like kernel provides a complete set of standard Unix utilities and libraries that enable you to use the BSD and OS X elements simultaneously.

For the record, OS X is my platform of choice. I develop Web applications using Perl, MySQL, and others while writing articles and books using Microsoft Word, all on a Power book G4 running OS X.

Choosing a Server Solution

OpenBSD is the obvious choice on the server because of its very high security
principles. With such a safe environment it’s easy to deploy an OpenBSD-based server
without worrying too much that the system or network will be compromised. OpenBSD, in
particular, is ideal for use as a public-side server on the network and
for providing firewall and proxy services between the Internet and an internal network.

For a pure Web server, FreeBSD is also a good choice purely because of its stability
on key hardware platforms like x86. The quality of the disk drivers and networking
stack means exceptionally high levels of availability. It’s also possible to
make FreeBSD more secure by specifically disabling the services you don’t need to
support.

If you prefer to work within the general security of the BSD platform, but with a
friendlier configuration and management environment, consider Mac OS X
Server. It provides all the benefits of the FreeBSD platform, with a friendlier front end.
OS X Server provides more extensive support for Apache; file sharing through NFS,
AppleTalk, and Samba; a built-in firewall and VPN; directory services through OpenLDAP; and
audio/video streaming through QuickTime. This functionality comes pre-configured
and ready to use.

All of this comes at a price. Unlike other offerings, OS X Server is a commercial
product. Although Darwin is free, the configuration and management tools built into OS X Server make it so nice to use compared to the other BSD
options.

All in all, when evaluating a Unix-based OS other than Linux, all of the BSD variants are equally matched.

thumbnail Martin Brown

Martin Brown is a ServerWatch contributor.

Recommended for you...

What Is a Container? Understanding Containerization
What Is a Print Server? | How It Works and What It Does
Nisar Ahmad
Dec 8, 2023
What Is a Network Policy Server (NPS)? | Essential Guide
Virtual Servers vs. Physical Servers: Comparison and Use Cases
Ray Fernandez
Nov 14, 2023
ServerWatch Logo

ServerWatch is a top resource on servers. Explore the latest news, reviews and guides for server administrators now.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.