Hardware Today: HP Shows Some OpenVMS Integrity Page 2

執筆者
Drew Robb
Drew Robb
Published: Jul 20, 2010
Updated: Nov 10, 2020
2 minute read
ServerWatch のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る




VMS Superdome



While the release of entry-level Integrity systems for OpenVMS is a good start, a large percentage of the VMS user base uses midrange and high-end Alphas for high-availability applications or disaster recovery. So how does Integrity look to them?

“My real caution is around running seriously mission-critical stuff, especially on the big machines in the Alpha GS1280 class, not the smaller Alpha DS15 that can run on the Integrity rx2600,” said Butcher. “But the big stuff is not the kind of machine that you buy and replace quickly.”

HP originally planned to release OpenVMS version 8.2-1 with support for the full line of Integrity servers, including Superdome, some time in the first half of 2006. However, major OpenVMS customers demanded a more rapid time line. As a result, version 8.2-1 is scheduled for September 2005, with support for the Madison-9-based Superdome and rx8620 Integrity servers. HP also plans at that time to provide increased node support of mixed platform AlphaServer and Integrity clusters, and hard partition support for these systems.

“Users will like the performance of the midrange Integrity systems supported in V8.2-1, and I know they will like the price,” said Gorham. “Many have stated that the port was very easy and in certain cases ran faster on Integrity than on AlphaServers.”

Butcher does, however, express some reservations. “Performance might be an issue at the moment,” he says. “The big Alphas probably outperform the larger Itanium boxes, but that will change with time.”


Should I Stay, or Should I Go?



As far as existing Alpha users are concerned, who should move to Itanium and who shouldn’t? If everything you need is supported on Itanium, then consider using it from Day One. But be aware that you will be among the first to use it in a production environment.

“It’s all about assessing risk and striking an appropriate balance between risk and costs,” says Butcher. “Personally, I’d be more cautious in a large-scale, mission-critical environment where a small number of big systems are in use.”

Other important criteria to consider in any move from Alpha- to Itanium-based systems are consolidation, performance, and cost. According to HP, some applications receive a performance boost on Integrity compared to the old Alpha hardware. For larger-scale systems, however, such a performance increase is probably a few years away.

Advertisement

“Be aware of support costs for Alpha, which will probably rise above those for Itanium boxes,” said Gezelter. “And don’t rush to be the first to use the new systems unless you have some pretty good reasons to do so.”

Drew Robb

Originally from Scotland, Drew Robb has been a full-time writer for more than 25 years. He lives in Florida and specializes in IT, engineering, and business. As well as eWeek and TechRepublic, he writes for a wide range of magazines including Gas Turbine World, SDxCentral, and HR Magazine. He is the author of Server Disk Management in a Windows Environment (Auerbach Publications).

ServerWatch Logo

ServerWatch is a top resource on servers. Explore the latest news, reviews and guides for server administrators now.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。